With more than 650 mass shootings in 2023 and more than 110 this year (at the time of publication), it’s clear that active assailant incidents pose a severe and unpredictable threat to businesses of all types. And while most insureds have not been exposed to an active assailant event, the demand for this coverage is on the rise.
In the past decade, more than 40 million Americans lived within one mile of a mass shooting and a number of high-profile tragedies in the education, healthcare, manufacturing and entertainment sectors have left a lasting impact. So, who is responsible for our safety and security while we’re at work?
Many say that the responsibility for protecting employees while working lies with the employer. The state of California would seem to agree, recently passing Senate Bill 553, which is dedicated to occupational safety and workplace violence prevention.
The bill goes into effect July 1, 2024, and requires employers to establish, implement and maintain a written workplace violence prevention plan that includes recording workplace violence incidents, communicating with employees about those incidents and correcting potential hazards. The plan – and ongoing training about the plan – must be included as part of a company’s injury prevention program.
It is highly likely that other states will follow California’s lead, introducing similar bills and workplace regulations to help prevent protect employees. Regardless of if or when these additional rules take effect, companies must be prepared to take threats of violence seriously.
So, whether your insured is located in California or elsewhere in the U.S., they should begin to focus on:
If you already have a prevention plan in place, an audit to review the plan for compliance with local and state laws may be helpful. Many carriers have dedicated crisis consultants to help with this process, so be sure to check with them to determine what services are available to insureds.
California SB 553 not only details how employers must respond to workplace violence emergencies, it also outlines four types of violence:
Workers’ compensation insurance often provides cover for Type 3 violence, as well as issues between employees and matters of work. However, if someone with no affiliation to the business is injured, the incident is not covered.
Similarly, workplace violence coverage only protects employees (not third parties), and terrorism coverage generally focuses on property damage.
Active assailant coverage, on the other hand, equips insureds with the tools necessary to build a comprehensive business continuity plan and crisis prevention plan, while also helping to improve the insured’s risk and mitigate against future mishandling of events.
This full limit coverage with little to no deductible/excess helping an insured protect not only their property, employees and other victims but their brand as well as their cashflow with coverage for:
As a specialist standalone policy, active assailant coverage is event led. With the exception of legal liability, which would require a claim or suit, all other parts of the policy are triggered by the active assailant event itself.
These policies can also supplement terrorism and workplace violence coverage, as well as workers’ compensation.
Article Published By: Amwins
Article Written By: Nick Davis, Associate Director, Crisis Management with Amwins Global Risks